Furtick's "explanation" doesn't make any sense and only raises more questions.
Questions like:
1. Who made the decision to EDIT OUT the sermon from the Code Orange Revival re-broadcasts?
2. Why was the decision made to EDIT OUT the sermon from the Code Orange Revival re-broadcasts?
3. How on earth does it make any sense for anyone to make the decision to EDIT OUT the sermon from the Code Orange Revival re-broadcasts? Isn't that like a hamburger joint making the decision to sell hamburgers with no meat?
Fact is, Furtick's "explanation" is a flimsy effort at spin/damage control and an admission that a deliberate decision was made to remove Chandler's sermon from the first two rebroadcasts.
I'll be discussing this more on Monday's edition of Fighting for the Faith.
Chris Rosebrough
Email your questions or comments to: talkback@fightingforthefaith.com